If you’re here, you’ve probably heard pieces of Ingo’s story: the artist who helped pioneer remote viewing, the man whose work drew the attention of scientists and intelligence agencies, the researcher who spent his life exploring the deeper capacities of human perception.
But behind the headlines and the speculation was a full human being: thoughtful, disciplined, creative, and often misunderstood.
Ingo devoted his life to investigating one of the most overlooked aspects of human experience: our perceptual awareness systems, the internal mechanisms through which we sense, interpret, and respond to information beyond our ordinary focus.
Much of his legacy has been framed through the modern language of “psychics” and “the unknown,” but these terms are recent inventions, and often misleading. Before the word psychic entered popular use in the late 19th century, individuals with heightened perceptual abilities were more commonly known as sensitives. Across cultures and eras, societies understood such capacities as part of the natural range of human perception, not as curiosities or parlor phenomena.
The Romans spoke of the sensorium, the inner seat of perception where impressions, intuition, and subtle forms of awareness were processed. In India, Hindu yogis developed sophisticated systems for cultivating heightened perception through meditation, breathwork, and disciplined attention. Many Indigenous cultures across the world recognized individuals with acute sensitivity to symbolic, environmental, or energetic patterns, integrating them into communal roles. Medieval contemplatives, ancient Greek oracles, Tibetan adepts, Sufi mystics, and early Chinese scholars all explored these perceptual capacities as part of the human experience.
Seen through this broader historical lens, Ingo’s work belongs to a long cross-cultural lineage of perceptual inquiry, rather than the sensationalism often attached to modern “psychic” narratives. He was sharply critical of sloppy science, exaggerated claims, and pseudoscientific thinking. His approach was grounded, structured, and intellectually rigorous, aimed not at mystifying human perception, but at understanding how it actually works.
Here, we present a clearer picture:
- An artist with powerful visual intuition.
- A researcher who worked closely with scientists at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) and numerous other institutions.
- A methodologist, helping shape the framework of Controlled Remote Viewing (CRV).
- A theorist exploring how human perception operates on subtle and largely unrecognized levels.
This space exists to give him the fairness, context, and depth that public articles rarely provide. Here, you can learn not only about the experiments and the government programs, but also about Ingo’s art, his ideas, his writings, and the careful, methodical approach he brought to a field that was often sensationalized.
If you’ve only encountered the dramatic stories, you’re welcome here.
If you’re curious, skeptical, or simply interested in understanding what really happened, you’re welcome here too.
The goal of this site is simple: to present Ingo as he truly was. Not as a caricature, not as a myth, but as a pioneering thinker whose work deserves clarity and context.
Thank you for being part of this discovery.
